6000 year old rock

Contributed by
Jan 22, 2007

Note: I am still recovering from TAM 5! I will try to sit down tonight and get a good entry written about it. But until then, I have some other things to say.

What with the Grand Canyon stuff still going on, I sometimes find people asking what the big deal is. Why worry so much about a book that says the Grand Canyon is only 6000 years old?

Besides the obvious -- the book is dead wrong, it is antiscience, it is in violation of the First Amendment, and the National Park Service has been very dodgy about doing anything about it -- young Earth creationism garbage does real damage to people's ability to discern reality from fantasy.

Lauren Becker, a science interpreter who has taught at museums and parks around the country, says it better than I do: She wrote an essay for CSIPCOP about it that's wonderful. Read it, think about it, discuss it below.

Tip of the ranger hat to Johnny Five for the link.

Make Your Inbox Important

Like Comic-Con. Except every week in your inbox.

Sign-up breaker
Sign out: