More info i

In lost interview, Stanley Kubrick explains the ending of 2001: A Space Odyssey

Contributed by
Jul 16, 2020, 5:50 PM EDT (Updated)

Fifty years since it was first screened, 2001: A Space Odyssey continues to cause confusion and debate. Stanley Kubrick’s epic film reimagined what cinematic science fiction could be, but it also went into esoteric areas, most notably with an ending that the director famously refused to discuss.

New video and audio uploaded to YouTube appears to offer Kubrick explaining the ending as he saw it and developed it. The footage is from, of all places, “an unreleased/unaired Japanese paranormal TV documentary” that Japanese TV personality and paranormal figure Jun’ichi Yaoi was working on. Be warned, there are spoilers for 2001 below:

The clip above is from the full 84 minutes of footage shot for Yaoi’s documentary, partially to explore reports of unusual or paranormal events on the set of The Shining. The director himself is not seen in the footage, only heard while talking to Yaoi, in the apparent interview from 1980. Eventually Yaoi asked Kubrick about 2001’s ending, when astronaut David Bowman (Keir Dullea) is transformed into a “Starchild.”

Kubrick himself notes that talking about the film’s iconic ending was something he’d “tried to avoid doing this ever since the picture came out.”

Here’s the transcript of Kubrick’s comments:

“I’ve tried to avoid doing this ever since the picture came out. When you just say the ideas they sound foolish, whereas if they’re dramatized one feels it, but I’ll try.

The idea was supposed to be that he is taken in by god-like entities, creatures of pure energy and intelligence with no shape or form. They put him in what I suppose you could describe as a human zoo to study him, and his whole life passes from that point on in that room. And he has no sense of time. It just seems to happen as it does in the film.

They choose this room, which is a very inaccurate replica of French architecture (deliberately so, inaccurate) because one was suggesting that they had some idea of something that he might think was pretty, but wasn’t quite sure. Just as we’re not quite sure what do in zoos with animals to try to give them what we think is their natural environment.

Anyway, when they get finished with him, as happens in so many myths of all cultures in the world, he is transformed into some kind of super being and sent back to Earth, transformed and made into some sort of superman. We have to only guess what happens when he goes back. It is the pattern of a great deal of mythology, and that is what we were trying to suggest.”

Kubrick’s answer ties into what Arthur C. Clarke’s novel explored in its ending. The film itself is currently screening in select theaters as part of the 50th anniversary celebration.

Does Kubrick’s apparent explanation work for you?