Science blogging versus journalism

Contributed by
Jul 7, 2009

I recently gave a talk at the National Academy of Sciences about science blogging, social networking, and communication in general. I had a lot of fun, and the NAS has posted a podcast about the meeting with some excerpts of what I said (they have a list of older 'casts as well).

I've talked about this before, this new media we're facing and embracing. Well, most of us are embracing it. Recently, fellow science/skeptic blogger Ben Goldacre ran into some static from a journalist who just doesn't get it, and in fact appears to have his fingers firmly in his ears while he yells "LALALALALALA!". I was all set to write about this, but yet another fellow science/skeptic blogger, Steve Novella, took the electrons right out of my keyboard.

He's right: we need to look to the internet as a solution and opportunity, not a road block to information. Newspapers and other media who took the latter path are finding themselves starved of revenue, because they just don't get it. Ones who did -- like Discover and Seed magazines -- are flourishing online. I'd say that's pretty strong evidence that media and journalists taking hold of this not-so-new medium are the ones who will still be around in the long run.

Make Your Inbox Important

Get our newsletter and you’ll be delivered the most interesting stories, videos and interviews weekly.

Sign-up breaker